The Much Vaunted National Health Service©, not content with killing off hospital-bound victims patients, has set its sights a bit lower:
"[MVNHS©] won't pay for child cancer treatment that 'cuts deaths by 25% - Some British parents are taking their children to the US to receive a three-drug treatment"
Question: Why does President Obama hate British children?
The Brits are "refusing to fund a treatment for one of the most common cancers suffered by children." That's actually a bit misleading: under a nationalized health care scheme, "refusing to pay" means "denying treatment to." It's a terrifically (or horrifically, depending on one's perspective) efficient means of rationing care. And, of course, it's exactly how ObamaCare is designed to work.
Oh well, it's just kids, right?
"[MVNHS©] won't pay for child cancer treatment that 'cuts deaths by 25% - Some British parents are taking their children to the US to receive a three-drug treatment"
Question: Why does President Obama hate British children?
The Brits are "refusing to fund a treatment for one of the most common cancers suffered by children." That's actually a bit misleading: under a nationalized health care scheme, "refusing to pay" means "denying treatment to." It's a terrifically (or horrifically, depending on one's perspective) efficient means of rationing care. And, of course, it's exactly how ObamaCare is designed to work.
Oh well, it's just kids, right?
MVNHS©: It's for the chillun' (or maybe not)
![MVNHS©: It's for the chillun' (or maybe not)]()
Reviewed by ndolpit
Published :
Rating : 4.5
Published :
Rating : 4.5
